Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Roberto Lopez, 71-2431 (1972)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Number: 71-2431 Visitors: 8
Filed: Apr. 10, 1972
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 458 F.2d 382 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Roberto LOPEZ, Defendant-Appellant. No. 71-2431. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. April 10, 1972. Roger L. Cossack, of Cossack & Karp, Los Angeles, Cal., for defendant-appellant. William D. Keller, U. S. Atty., Eric A. Nobles, Larry S. Flax, Asst. U. S. Attys., Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee. Before CHAMBERS, WRIGHT and GOODWIN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: 1 Lopez was convicted of selling cocaine in violation
More

458 F.2d 382

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Roberto LOPEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 71-2431.

United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.

April 10, 1972.

Roger L. Cossack, of Cossack & Karp, Los Angeles, Cal., for defendant-appellant.

William D. Keller, U. S. Atty., Eric A. Nobles, Larry S. Flax, Asst. U. S. Attys., Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee.

Before CHAMBERS, WRIGHT and GOODWIN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Lopez was convicted of selling cocaine in violation of 26 U.S.C. Sec. 4705(a).

2

The complaint was filed after the crime was committed. Then the section was repealed by P.L. 91-513 (Sec. 1101). After the repeal, the indictment followed and then the trial and conviction.

3

But the trouble is that P.L. 91-513 had a saving clause in it which kept his crime alive.

4

Judgment affirmed and the mandate will issue now.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer